09 February 2007

Climate Jury In-- Time for Action Has Arrived

Here's my latest column from the St. Cloud Times...
---------------------------------

Climate report must inspire action

By Derek Larson

St. Cloud (MN) Times
Published: February 07. 2007 12:30AM

Have you heard the one about the priest, the rabbi and the ostrich who walk into a bar across from the United Nations? No?

Well perhaps you've heard the one about the 600 scientists from 40 countries who wrote a report on climate change that was reviewed by 620 more experts and 113 governments before it was released Friday?

If not, you should have.

The latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change may well represent the tipping point in the world's response to the threat of global warming. Six years in the making, the IPCC study has laid to rest the idea that the jury is still out on climate change (most scientists have been decided for years) and, with luck, the report will spur action.

The report comes when signs of awakening are coming from all sectors of society.

Evangelical Christians have organized to address the issue. Business leaders have called for new regulations on carbon emissions. Recently under new management, Congress is holding hearings on climate change and investigating charges Bush administration officials muzzled federal scientists and punished researchers for revealing results of climate-related work.

And while the president's Iraq policy rightly drew the most attention during last month's State of the Union address, the fact that he uttered "global climate change" prompted headlines nationwide.

Slow to change

Have you wondered why most of the world has accepted what credible scientists have been saying about climate change for years, while here in the United States our president tells us that "the issue needs more study?" The answer is really quite simple: politics.

Back in 2003, Republican strategists realized they were losing the environmental debate. That spring, Republican consultant Frank Luntz wrote a memo to party strategists arguing that "voters believe that there is no consensus about global warming within the scientific community. Should the public come to believe that the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will change accordingly... Therefore, you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue in the debate."

That's exactly what the president and his allies in the oil, gas, coal and electric power industries did. Exxon-Mobil spent $16 million from 1998-2005 creating organizations to foster the impression that scientists were still debating climate issues.

A nation awakens

Oddly enough, this scenario has played out before. In 1962, an unassuming marine biologist named Rachel Carson published "Silent Spring," a damning indictment of the pesticide industry. The unabated and unnecessary use of pesticides, she argued, would culminate in a world devoid of birds and a spring without birdsong. More pressingly, the same products that industry claimed brought "better living through chemistry" were already sowing cancers and other horrors in humans.

Carson was savagely attacked by the chemical industry, accused of being a hysterical woman, a lesbian, a Communist and an unqualified spinster. Carson died of breast cancer less than two years after her book was published and did not live to see the environmental movement she helped give birth to flourish.

But "Silent Spring" was translated into 35 languages and sold millions of copies worldwide, changing history not because it offered radically new ideas, but because average people read it and finally began to question the industry's claims that pesticides' convenience came without side effects.

It is possible the IPCC report could become the "Silent Spring" of the 21st century. Now that its findings have been released, any remaining debate about whether climate change deserves our attention should be limited to the reactionary fringe. What remains for the rest of us is much more important. Deciding what to do about it, how quickly and at what cost will be the defining tasks of this generation of world leaders, and they need our help. Hopefully they won't pass the job on to the next generation unfinished.

01 February 2007

RIP Molly Ivins

Molly Ivins has lost her battle with breast cancer. An appreciation and several old interviews can be found on the NPR web page. Her brave and witty voice will be missed.

You can learn more about breast cancer and help support research for a cure with these organizations.

Give 'em hell Molly!

-Dr. DRL

08 November 2006

Voters Call for Action on Real Issues

The results are now mostly in: Democrats picked up the House and may well take the Senate too. Nationally the Republicans won exactly ZERO seats previously held by Democrats, including the governors, while the Democrats picked up 28 seats in the House and 4-6 in the Senate. State and even local races played out the same, with voters rejecting the Republican agenda of divisive social issues and pie in the sky plans for Iraq in favor of actually doing something that matters to Americans. They demanded an end to worthless debates over flag burning, gay marriage, abortion, and Terri Schiavo's medical condition; instead they have called for action on Iraq, education, repealing the Bush tax cuts, progressive energy policy, better environmental regulation, and an end to the corporate handouts crafted into bills written by lobbyists working hand in hand with House leadership. They have resoundingly rejected the politics of Tom Delay and Dick Army, not only in Washington, but at the state and local levels as well.

"Time for a change" indeed. It's been a long time coming, and it's too bad it took so long for voter disgust to reach this level. Much damage has been done, many opportunities lost. Here's hoping we can all move forward on an agenda that will actually improve conditions for Americans of all stripes, and begin the hard work of restoring our reputation abroad as well.

07 November 2006

No Time To Gloat: Get To Work Dems!

Watching the returns pile in the news is almost universally good-- the house has tipped dramatically, the senate is still in play but will end up very close to even. Here in Minnesota Republicans have lost 13 seats on their way to becoming the minority party in the house, and lost another 5 seats in the senate. Even the draconian South Dakota abortion measure appears to have failed by a wide margin. The only major disappointment so far was Patty Wetterling's defeat in Minnesota's 6th district...we'll have to keep a close eye on Bachman because she's something of a conservative loon. Thankfully she'll be a freshman rep in a demoralized and disorganized minority, so can do little damage before having to stand for re-election in 2008. (Note to DFL: Patty was a good candidate but it's time to find someone else to run for this seat.)

Meanwhile, free advice to the Democrats: don't gloat and get right to work. You've been handed power for a reason and have a very short period to prove yourselves worthy of keeping it. 2008 remains wide open and the Republicans could easily reorganize and take back the house if you don't deal honestly and openly with the agenda the people are calling for. That means action on Iraq, oversight of the administration (hearings yes, impeachment no), reform on health care, more support for education, a more enlightened energy policy, and the end of religious extremists dictating policy on topics like medical research, education, and science. Oh- and perhaps a bit of attention to the environment when you get around to it.

But I wouldn't blame the Dems for marginalizing at least a few R's in the house-- say anyone from Leadership that still has a seat. Have fun being irrelevant Denny H.!